9911796707
TMI Blog2011 (6) TMI 579X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nly, the appellant has failed to obtain any extension of time for pre-deposit from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court, order dated 10.06.2011, the appellant were specifically directed either to report compliance of the stay order dated 03.01.2011 or a stay order against the order dated 03.01.2011 from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court failing which the appeal be dismissed without further notice, appeal dis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... -deposit till 03.03.2011. Therefore, the matter was adjourned for compliance to 04.03.2011. When the matter came up for compliance on 08.04.2011, there was no compliance was reported nor any stay order was produced, the matter was posted for 27.05.2011 for reporting compliance. On 27.05.2011, it was stated by the appellant that due to the summer vacation, the matter is listed on 08.06.2011 befor ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ubmitted that the matter is listed before the Hon'ble High Court on 20.06.2011, therefore the appeal may not be dismissed for non-compliance as observed by the Hon'ble High Court in the case of Jai Prakash Strips Ltd. vs. Union of India - 2009 (243) ELT 341 (Bom.). 3. On the other hand, the learned DR strongly opposed the request for adjournment made by the learned Counsel. 4. Heard and consid ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ereafter, the appellant has failed to obtain any extension of time for pre-deposit from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court. Vide order dated 10.06.2011, the appellant were specifically directed either to report compliance of the stay order dated 03.01.2011 or a stay order against the order dated 03.01.2011 from the Hon'ble Bombay High Court failing which the appeal be dismissed without further notice. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
