9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (8) TMI 343X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hereas in ST-5 it is mentioned as 08.08.11 - Held that:- We find that the appellant has been callous in exercising his right of appeal before us and has not given sufficient cause for seeking the condonation of delay. There is no bonafide reason for not filing the appeal in time. Accordingly, we are convinced that the appellant has not made out a case for the condonation of delay. Appeal dismissed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Gangadhara Palo 2011 (266) ELT 3 (S.C.). 3. Heard the ld. SDR. 4. On perusal of the records, in the said affidavit we find that there is no dispute as to the order in appeal having been received by the appellant. The reasoning given in the application for condonation of delay is one of the directors M/s. Neo Structo Construction Ltd. who ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the condonation of delay. The affidavit filed by Shri Surendran Nanu Vaidyan does not instil any confidence in as to take a view that there was sufficient cause for belated filing of appeal. In our mind there is no bonafide reason for not filing the appeal in time. Accordingly, we are convinced that the appellant has not made out a case for the condonation of delay. Accordingly, in view of the for ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
