TMI Blog2012 (9) TMI 562X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y has dismissed their appeal for non-compliance of the order of pre-deposit - appellant has made pre-deposit of the entire amount of service tax. Therefore, considering the same is sufficient and the first appellate authority has not passed the order on merits, we remand the matter back to the first appellate authority to decide the issue on merits - ST/665/2010 - - - Dated:- 2-1-2012 - Shri ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ld not make pre-deposit till 26/08/2010, therefore, on 31/08/2010 their appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of the provisions of the Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with Section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994. On 04/09/2010 the appellant has complied with the stay order and, therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant prays that the matter be remanded back to the first appel ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|