2012 (11) TMI 736

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Rep by: Ms D M Durando, Dy. Commr.(AR)   Per: Ashok Jindal: Heard both sides. 2. The appellant has filed the appeal against the impugned order along with applications for stay of the impugned order as well as application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the impugned order has been passed on 07.01.1999 and they have not .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ertains to dates prior to the date of passing of the impugned order. Therefore, we hold that the impugned order was not served on the appellant. In view of these observations, we allow the application for condonation of delay. 5. We further find that, as the impugned order is an ex-parte order and it is contended on behalf of the appellant that the appellant left for Dubai in the year 1997 and ca .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X