2012 (11) TMI 914

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... eferring the appeal within the period of limitation - Delay condoned by 156 days in preferring the appeal. - 576 of 2011 - - - Dated:- 25-4-2012 - Bhaskar Bhattacharya, ACJ and J.B. Pardiwala, J. REPRESENTED BY : Shri A.S. Asthavadi, for the Appellant. Shri Darshan M. Parikh, for the Respondent. [Order per : Bhaskar Bhattacharya, ACJ (Oral)]. It appears that against a common .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nsel for the parties and after going through the explanation given in the application, we are convinced that sufficient cause has been made out for not preferring the appeal within the period of limitation. 5. We thus condone the delay of 156 days in preferring the appeal. The appeal be registered. Let the appeal come up for admission on May 2, 2012. 6. The application thus stands disposed of. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X