9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (12) TMI 514X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppellant: Ms. Sukriti Das, Advocate Present for the Respondent: Shri N. Pathak, DR Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): All the three matters are disposed of by a common order as the issue is identical. 2. It is seen vide stay order No. ST/667-669/11 dated 19.9.11, the appellant was directed to deposit 25% of the Service Tax confirmed against them within a period of 8 weeks from that date. As ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hallans indicating deposit of entire amount of Service Tax. In view of the above, we recall the order of dismissal of appeals and restore the appeals to their original numbers. COD applications as also ROA applications are allowed in the above terms. 5. At this stage, learned advocate fairly agrees that the issue stand decided by the Tribunal in the appellants own case i.e. in the case of M/s. Ma ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the banking and financial services. The appellants contention that being a bank run by co-operative society, they would not be liable to pay Service Tax. The said contention of the applicant was considered by the Tribunal in the above referred decision of Madhav Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd. and was not found favour with. Accordingly, by following the above decision, we hold that the appellants are l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
