2013 (1) TMI 333

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or the Respondent. [Order]. -  P.C. : Whether the CESTAT is justified in directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 40 lakhs in addition to the amount of Rs. 35 lakhs already deposited for restoring the appeal which was dismissed on 9th January, 2004, is the question raised in this appeal. 2. The appeal is admitted on the above question and taken up for final hearing by consent of parties .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by its application dated 9th December, 2010 applied for restoration of the appeal which was dismissed on 9th January, 2004. 5. By the impugned order dated 1st May, 2012 the Tribunal has directed the appellant to deposit a further sum of Rs. 40 lakhs for restoring of the appeal dismissed on 9th January, 2004. 6. No doubt, there is inordinate delay on the part of the appellant in complyi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X