2013 (6) TMI 169

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... turer of steel M.S. Ingots, had removed certain Cenvat credit availed inputs, as such, and in terms of the provisions of Rule 3 (5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 paid an amount equal to the Cenvat credit actually availed. The department, however, issued a show cause notice for directing the appellant to also reverse the Cenvat credit of service tax paid on GTA service availed for bringing those .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... vs. Punjab Steels reported in 2011 (12) STR 5 (P&H) pleaded that issue involved in this case stands decided in favour of the appellant and, hence, the impugned order is not sustainable. 4. Shri R.K. Mathur, the learned Departmental Representative, defended the impugned order by reiterating the findings of the Commissioner (Appeals) in it. 5. I have considered the submissions from both the sides .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X