9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (8) TMI 163X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... For the Respondent: Shri R.K. Verma, AR JUDGEMENT Per Archana Wadhwa (for the Bench): The short issue involved in the present appeal is the refund of SAD paid by the appellant at the time of import of Television sets. The lower authorities have rejected the refund claim on the ground of time bar by observing that duty was paid on 10.12.07 and 4.12.07 whereas the refund claim was filed on 12. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d the stamp of the bank on the treasury challans showing date of deposit as 14.12.07 and 19.12.07 were wrongly marked. However he submits that the appellant has gone by the date of such stamps on the Treasury challans and has filed the refund claim within the period of one year from the date of treasury challans, as the stamped by Bank. He submits that the appellant is dealing with hundreds of bil ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 6 challan is relevant for the purpose of deciding the limitation. This is peculiar case where the duty was deposited on 10.12.07 and 4.12.07 and the bank has wrongly stamped the challans with the date stamp of 14.12.07 and 19.12.07. Be it as it may be, there is no dispute that duties were actually paid on 10th and 4th December of 2007. As per the provisions of notification No. 6/2008, refund of SA ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
