2013 (8) TMI 730

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re, the mild fine of Rs.2.00 Lakhs imposed in adjudication does not call for interference. - decided against the assessee. - Appeal No.C/767 to 769/2008 - FINAL ORDER NO. 56174-56176/201 - Dated:- 12-4-2013 - Mr. D. N. Panda Mr. Manmohan Singh, JJ. For the Appellant: Shri S. Vasudevan, Advocate For the Respondent: Shri. P. K. Sharma, DR JUDGEMENT PER: D.N.PANDA Ld. Counsel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... interest of Revenue. We do appreciate that such a use is not possible without human intervention and object or motive is imputed to that. Therefore, the mild fine of Rs.2.00 Lakhs imposed in adjudication does not call for interference. So far as penalty on Shri. S.P. Sachdeva is concerned, we also do not find any material opportunity to exonerate him from penalty levied in adjudication. But the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X