2013 (8) TMI 847

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t No. II, which is almost 25% of the duty confirmed against the assessee - Decided in favour of Revenue. - Appeals Nos.E/3124/ 2005 and E/3309/2005 - - - Dated:- 2-5-2013 - Smt. Archana Wadhwa and Shri Rakesh Kumar, JJ. For the Appellant: Shri S. Bector, DR and Shri R.K. Mathur, DR For the Respondent: Shri Vikrant Kackaria, Advocate JUDGEMENT Per: Archana Wadhwa: After hear .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - imposed upon Unit No. I under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules. Hence the present appeals by the Revenue. 2. We find that the law stands declared by the Hon ble Supreme Court in the case of Dharmendra Textiles reported laying down that in case of confirmation of demand of duty on the allegations of suppression, etc, the authorities have no discretion to impose less penalty and the penalty i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X