Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2013 (9) TMI 381

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ertain decisions of this Tribunal and one decision of the Supreme Court. Broadly speaking, the case law has been relied on by the appellant in support of their plea that no penalty was attracted where the CENVAT credit in question had been reversed without utilization. 2. The appellant had shifted their manufacturing unit from Bangalore to Hubli in the first week of April 2005. At that point of time, they had an amount of 2,64,226/- to their credit in CENVAT account. In a letter dated 21/3/2005, which was received by the Superintendent of Central Excise, Peenya VI range, Bangalore on 1/4/2005, the appellant had intimated their plan to shift their unit to Tarihal Industrial Area of Hubli and had also intimated the raw material stock of 9880 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . The Superintendent (A.R.), in answer to queries from the Bench, submits that the date of taking of CENVAT credit in question by the appellant at Hubli and the date of its reversal are not available. The fact remains that the original authority in this case, in adjudication of a show-cause notice issued to the appellant on 10/4/2006, demanded interest on the amount of CENVAT Credit under Rule 14 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 read with Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, apart from demanding the said amount of CENVAT credit under Rule 14 read with Section 11A of the Act. It also imposed a penalty of Rs 25,000/- on the appellant under Rule 15(i) of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. In an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... On these facts, it is prayed that the assessees appeal against the penalty be dismissed. 3. After considering the above arguments of the learned Superintendent (A.R.) as well as the written submissions of the appellant, I am of the view that there is a valid reason for remanding of this case to the original authority for fresh decision on the question whether, on the facts of this case, a penalty under Rule 15 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 is warranted and, if so, to what extent. It appears from the records that the penalty was imposed for contravention of Rule 3(1) read with Rule 10 of the CENVAT Credit Rules 2004. Rule 3 is a substantive provision providing for CENVAT credit as a benefit to be claimed by a manufacturer of final produc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... tter to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Hubli Division, intimating that they had already shifted their plant and machinery along with raw material and semi-finished stock to Hubli. The full address of the Hubli Unit was also furnished in that letter. A copy of this letter was addressed to the Superintendent of Central Excise, Peenya Range, Bangalore. In another letter of even date addressed to the Dy. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bangalore, the appellant stated that they were surrendering their registration certificate at Bangalore and that they would be applying for registration at Hubli. A copy of this letter was endorsed to the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Hubli Division. The letter addressed to the Dy. Comm .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... it was shifted to Hubli cannot be confirmed. There is a gap of 5 days between the date of application for permission of Bangalore authorities and the date of intimation of shifting of the Unit to the Hubli authorities. It appears, the unit was shifted some time between 1st April and 5th April 2005. It is up to the original authority to ascertain the correct factual position. In case inaction is found on the part of the central excise authorities at Bangalore, it will be a mitigating factor for the appellant in the penalty-related context. Therefore, I set aside the penalty and allow this appeal by way of remand with a direction to the original authority to ascertain the correct facts and take fresh decision on the question whether the appel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates