9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (9) TMI 847X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n responded to the charge sheet in terms of having filed a detailed reply. As on date even Inquiry Officer stands appointed. Against such factual back drop it would not be open for the petitioner to file the present writ petition which can be construed only as an attempt to scuttle the departmental proceedings at the very outset. It is not the case set up on behalf of the petitioner that the charg ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er dated 06.06.2000 (Annexure P-9) issued by the Commissioner of Customs-respondent No.2. Counsel for the petitioner would raise a two fold submission. It has been argued that the articles of charge framed against the petitioner are not even made out as there has been no violation on the part of the petitioner of any instructions issued by the department. That apart, counsel has argued that in the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nt of imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour in support of the articles of charge are also contained in the charge sheet. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has admitted during the course of arguments that petitioner has even responded to the charge sheet in terms of having filed a detailed reply. As on date even Inquiry Officer stands appointed. Against such factual back drop it would not b ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
