2013 (9) TMI 909

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... R Heard respective counsel. 2. Challenge is to the order of CESTAT dated 2-8-2010 refusing to condone delay of 8 years in filing appeal before it. The order questioned was dated 28-3-2002. By that order the Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with its earlier order by which the appellant was directed to pre-deposit 25% of total amount (approximately Rs. 1,02,940/-) and .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X