9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 86X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ation to the same is over therefore this information is to be provided to the appellant. However, in relation to the complaints/references in relation to which investigation/inquiry is still pending, the name, complaint no. and date of complaint shall be provided as premature disclosure of information may effect the process of investigation - such information is expected to be a part of the record of the public authority - order of the first appellate authority should not be merely a cryptic order, the first appellate authority is bound to pass a speaking order giving reasoning behind the order - Decision in favour of appellant. - Case No. CIC/SS/A/2012/001879 - - - Dated:- 15-4-2013 - Sushma Singh, J. Shri R.K. Jain, the Appellant. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... gation/complaint were taken place since 2006 or are pending. The information at point (a) (d) was denied to the appellant on the ground that it is third party information and that Section 8(1)(d) applied to these two points. 5. At point (b) the appellant sought name designation of the present officers who were responsible for approving the above inspection agencies and also name and designation of officers who are now responsible for taking action. At this point the CPIO stated that the information is not available. 6. At point no. (e) the appellant sought copies of complaints/references received against the inspection agencies since Jan 2006 and the present status of such complaint. At point (f) the appellant sought inspection ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... herefore directed to provide this information. 10. With regards point (e) (f) the copies of complaints/references received against inspection agencies since Jan. 2006 and their present status shall be provided to the appellant. 11. During the hearing the appellant has raised a plea that the first appellate authority has not passed a reasoned order and merely upheld that view of the CPIO and also that an opportunity of personal hearing was not granted to the appellant despite his request. The Commissioner is of the view that the order of the first appellate authority should not be merely a cryptic order, the first appellate authority is bound to pass a speaking order giving reasoning behind the order. 12. Directions of the Commission ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
