TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 337X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- The issue involved in the case covered by the decision of the co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal GLOBAL AGRO IMPEX Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, NOIDA [2013 (9) TMI 851 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] - Under Section 129E of Customs Act there was no requirement of pre-deposit of redemption fine - The detained goods were sufficient security for realising the dues from the order and therefore there was a co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tification No.55(RE-2008)/2004-2009, dt.05.11.2008 as amended by Notification No.57/2009-14, dt.17.08.2010 issued by DGFT authorities. On perusal of the conditions mentioned therein, we find that the goods which were sought to be exported by the appellant would fall within the restriction or clarification given by DGFT in the said notification which is evident from the report of Chief Chemist, Bas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|