Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1994 (11) TMI 404

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ither to the date of registration under section 9-A of the Orissa Sales Tax Act or date of application for registration in accordance with the provisions under section 9-A(2) of the proviso or the dealer would be assessed from the date when liability was incurred under section 4 of the Act?" 2.. The short facts necessary for answering the question posed may be briefly stated. The dealer was dealing with motor parts and had applied for registration under section 9-A of the Act on January 2, 1981. The registration certificate was issued under section 9 of the Act on August 27, 1981. As it was found that liability of the dealer has accrued under section 4 of the Act with effect from February 1, 1981, notice was served on the dealer under sec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... arch 31, 1981 having been annulled, the department moved the Tribunal for making a reference and having failed in their attempt and this Court on being moved, pursuant to the direction of this Court the question of law has been formulated and statement of case has been filed. 3.. Learned Standing Counsel for the department argued with vehemence that under the Act the liability accrues in case of a dealer whose gross turnover during the year immediately preceding the date of commencement of the Act exceeds the limit provided under sub-section (7) of section 4 and, therefore, the dealer would be liable to pay tax on sales and purchases effected and it cannot await till a registration certificate is issued pursuant to an application under se .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his Act on sales and purchases with effect from the month immediately following a period not exceeding 12 months during which his gross turnover exceeded the limit specified in sub-section (7). (3) Every dealer who has become liable to pay tax under this Act shall continue to be so liable until the expiry of three consecutive years during each of which his gross turnover has failed to exceed the limit specified in subsection (7) and such further period after the date of the said expiry as may be prescribed and his liability to pay tax under this Act shall cease on the expiry of the prescribed period: Provided that in calculating the period of three consecutive years, the part of a year during which a dealer became first or again liable .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion to a dealer engaged in the execution of works contract and in execution thereof supplies goods (whether as goods or in some other forms), Rs. 1,00,000; and (d) in relation to any other dealer not covered by clauses (a), (b) and (c) Rs. 2,00,000. Provided that nothing in this section shall apply in respect of a casual dealer." A plain reading of the aforesaid provisions unequivocally indicates that the transaction of a dealer would be liable for levy of sales tax when the gross turnover exceeds the limit as provided in the said section. The liability to pay tax has got no connection with the registration of a dealer under section 9 and the true meaning of section 9 is that if the dealer does not get himself registered even though h .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ion 4 of the Act. In other words, even though no liability had accrued under section 4 and as such it was not necessary for the dealer to have registration under section 9, but yet the dealer had made an application for voluntary registration under section 9-A by exercising his option and in that context the question had arisen as to whether the liability would accrue from the date of application or the date of registration. We fail to understand how the answer to the said question can have any application to the present case where on examination of records, it has been found that the liability had accrued since February 1, 1981, as the gross turnover of the dealer had exceeded. In the aforesaid premises, we answer the question posed in fav .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates