Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1993 (12) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t is expedient in the public interest so to do, hereby exempts from tax under the said Act the sale and purchase of the following goods, namely: 1.. All kinds of footwear not manufactured or marketed by large scale or medium scale industries up to the value of Rs. 20. Note.-Any industry with capital investment in plant and machinery exceeding Rs. 35 lacs shall be deemed to be a large scale/medium scale industries." The issue relates to liability to be taxed in respect of footwear manufactured by small-scale industries up to value of Rs. 20 under the Central Sales Tax Act in pursuance of the aforesaid notification. Under section 8(2-A) of the Central Sales Tax Act if any part of turnover of a dealer relates to the sale of any goods whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nterest so to do, the State Government may, by notification in the official Gazette (exempt, whether prospectively or retrospectively) from tax the (sale or purchase) of any goods or class of goods or any person or class of persons on such conditions and on payment of such fee as may be specified in the notification." Perusal of the aforesaid provision makes it clear that providing condition is something different from defining the goods or class of goods or the person or class of persons for the purposes of grant of exemption under section 4(2). The notification of exemption giving out the criteria for identifying the goods or class of goods or person or class of persons chosen for exemption under notification cannot be read as condition .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . While dealing with question whether the benefit of exemption enured under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act the court observed as under: "The facts which the dealer has to prove to get the benefit of the Government orders are intended only to identify the dealer and the goods in respect of which the exemption is sought and they are not conditions or specifications of circumstances relating to the turnover sought to be exempted from payment of tax within the meaning of those provisions. The specified circumstances and the specified conditions referred to in the explanation should relate to the transaction of sale of the commodity and not identification of the dealer or the commodity in respect of which the exemption is claimed. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... earned counsel for the Revenue urged that the petitioner had alternative remedy by challenging the assessment orders in appeal. Ordinarily this Court does not entertain the petition under article 226 where the statutory remedy of appeal was available to the petitioner. However in the facts and circumstances of the case when the petitioner had approached this Court at the threshold before the reassessment orders were passed and the matter has been examined on merit after hearing both the parties, and the issue raised in the petition is squarely covered by principles enunciated by the apex Court. I am not inclined to entertain objection as to entertaining this petition on the ground of availability of alternate remedy at this stage. Accordi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates