9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 738X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ppeal are directed against order-in-appeal No. YDB/911/RGD/2010 dated 28/12/2010 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Mumbai - Zone II. 2. The miscellaneous application has become infructuous in view of the order No. M/507/13/CSTB/C-I dated 07/03/2013 passed by this Tribunal and accordingly the same is dismissed as infructuous. 3. The appellant, M/s. Welspun Maxsteel Ltd. are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... at credit of Rs.1,65,353/- availed by the appellant during the period January to June 2008. The notice was adjudicated and the Cenvat credit was denied and sought to be recovered along with interest and also imposing penalty on the appellant. The appellant preferred an appeal against the said order which met with rejection. Hence, the appellant is before me. 4. The Ld. Counsel for the appellant s ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... her hand contends that this activity has no nexus with the manufacturing activity undertaken by the appellant. The barges are operated by the appellant for bringing the goods from the high seas to the jetty and the cost of transportation become part of the assessable value of the imported goods. The shipping fee has been paid for operating the barges and therefore, it is in relation to the transpo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ice as defined in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit 2004. Merely because the appellant had undertaken the operation of the tugs and barges, it cannot be said that such services would be an eligible input service as defined in Rule 2 (l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. However, this issue will have to be examined in depth at the time of final disposal of the appeal. Inasmuch as in appellant's own ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
