9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (10) TMI 1084X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... orge, Adv ORDER :- Revenue by this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 impugns findings of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal that the Assessing Officer had wrongly invoked Section 154 of the aforesaid Act. The appeal relates to assessment year 2004-05. 2. Return filed by the respondent-assessee for the said year was made subject matter of regular assessment and the returned in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 7th August, 2008, has been set aside. Firstly, the Assessing Officer had not complied with the principles of natural justice as he had earlier issued notice dated 18th March, 2008 for hearing fixed on 25th March, 2008, but the hearing on the said date was adjourned at the request of the respondent. Thereafter, no fresh date of hearing was fixed and order dated 7th August, 2008 was passed. The seco ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assed by the CIT (Appeals), wherein he has recorded the contention of the respondent-assessee. It stated that Rs.1,94,51,222/- in the earlier assessment year i.e., 2003-04, was shown as expense in the profit and loss account, but it was added back in the tax computation sheet. As there was error in the profit and loss account of the last assessment year, i.e. 2003-04, as the amount was treated/sho ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
