Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1996 (1) TMI 406

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the case, in determining the market value-cum-sale price at Rs. 117 per metric tonne by including transport charges and others in it? (2) Whether, the Board is justified in the facts and circumstances of the case, in maintaining imposition of penalty under section 17(3) as just and legal though inadvertently stated under section 43(1)? (3) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board is justified in maintaining the orders of lower authorities including penalty by discarding the order of Board of Revenue on the same matter for the year 1977-78? 2. The brief facts giving rise to this reference are: The applicant, M/s. Bharat Aluminium Company Ltd., Korba, is a registered dealer under the Act. The applicant-compan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e market value of bauxite, transportation charges have not been excluded and it was contended that if transportation charges are not excluded the value of bauxite raised from its mines comes to Rs. 117 per metric tonne and those purchased from Manikpur comes to Rs. 101.53 per metric tonne and if it is excluded the value of bauxite raised from its own mines would reduce to Rs. 70 and those purchased from Manikpur would reduce to Rs. 45 per metric tonne. This plea was not accepted by the Appellate Deputy Commissioner as the company itself has shown the value of bauxite at Rs. 117 per metric tonne in the books without making any distinction between the bauxite raised from its mines and those purchased from Manikpur. The appeal was accordingly .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sum charged for anything done by the dealer in respect of the goods at the time of or before delivery thereof other than the cost of freight or delivery or the cost of installation when such cost is separately charged and the expression 'purchase price' shall be construed accordingly." As per this definition, "sale price" would not include cost of freight or delivery or cost of installation when such cost is separately charged. It is further clarified that the expression "purchase price" shall be accordingly construed. 4.. The learned counsel for the assessee submitted that in the present case all the three authorities below have not properly examined the matter and he invited our attention to a statement showing the nature of bauxite .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... age rate of transportation, i.e., freight per metric tonne was Rs. 46.85 and, therefore, the actual cost of the goods would be Rs. 70.79 per metric tonne. All the authorities below have proceeded on the basis of so-called balance sheet and other books of account placed before them. Learned counsel for the assessee submits that all those records did contain this statement but somehow it has not been so referred and the authorities have only taken the landed cost at the plant at the rate of Rs. 117 but no attention was paid to the break-up. Therefore, the learned counsel has brought to our notice the said fact from the record which is the statement showing the nature of bauxite consumed and this document seems to have been taken notice of by .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the landed rate at the plant which included freight charges at the rate of Rs. 46.85 per metric tonne. Therefore, after deducting this as per section 2(o) of the Sales Tax Act, the price will come to Rs. 70.79 per metric tonne and the assessee-company is assessable at this rate of the goods brought by it as entry tax. Therefore, questions Nos. 1 and 3 are answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. 6.. As regards question No. 2 relating to imposition of penalty, it is submitted that in fact the assessee-company was under the misapprehension that they had already entered into contract with the SADA, Korba, for payment of octroi that they will pay Rs. 3 lacs to SADA annually and, therefore, they thought that they are not as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates