2013 (11) TMI 328

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ook appropriate action and filed the appeal - the delay of 88 days has been explained by the individuals responsible for the matters in the Company - the application for condonation of delay allowed – Decided in favour of Assessee. - Appeal No.:E/925 of 2012 - - - Dated:- 11-7-2013 - Mr. M.V. Ravindran AND Mr. H.K. Thakur, JJ. For the Appellant: Shri Shailesh P. Seth, Advocate For the R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ounsel in order to prepare and file the appeal before the Tribunal. It is also stated that due to oversight they could not follow-up the matter and later on when the department issued notice for recovery they came to know that appeal was not filed, they took appropriate action and filed the appeal. We find that delay is of 88 days and has been explained by the individuals responsible for the matte .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X