2013 (11) TMI 747

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... f the petition has been served upon     Mr. Sarvesh Jain, who is one of the standing counsel for the department. Counsel for petitioner submits that self same controversy came to be examined & decided by the Coordinate Bench in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1891/2013(Manglam Cement Limited Vs. The Superintendent, Central Excise Range-III Kota & Ors.) & other connected petitions .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... heard as contemplated by the Act at the earliest and preferably within a period of three weeks herefrom. The petitioners would unfailingly cooperate with the forums to meet the time frame fixed. It is made clear that this Court has not offered its comment on the merits of the appeals and/or interim applications filed and that the concerned forums would take appropriate decisions thereon without i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... recovery of the demand during the said period. The fact (supra) has not been controverted by the counsel appearing for respondents, as regards the orders passed, referred to supra. In the light of the orders (supra), the present petition stands disposed of with direction to the appellate authority/CESTAT to hear and decide the stay application filed by the petitioner as early as possible but pr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X