2013 (12) TMI 347

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... PER: D.N.PANDA; None appeared for the appellant nor there is any adjournment application. Clerk of the appellant was present on 12.01.2011 while the MA (COD) and stay applications were taken up for disposal. The length of delay was not explained on that day for which delay was not condoned. Once delay was not condoned, both stay application and appeal got dismissed. 2. Today also the appellant i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Bench directed to list the matter on 31.07.2012 for consideration of delay condonation application. On 31.07.2012 for absence of the appellant, the delay condonation application was dismissed observing non-prosecution. The aforesaid history of the case and absence of the appellant, clearly shows that the appellant is not keen except abusing the process of law making repeated prayer for restoration .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X