9911796707
TMI Blog1979 (1) TMI 228X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... th August, 1961 30th September, 1961 of the Chief Commissioner of Manipur. The substance of his complaint was that the Chief Commissioner had permitted by these orders, the 'settlement' of part of the public Road on respondents 1 to 4, thereby preventing the petitioner's free access to the public road from the adjoining land belonging to the petitioner on which his home-stood was situated. The W ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... as judicial Commissioner. The appellant sought and obtained a certificate under Article 133(1)(c) of the Constitution from Shri R S. Bindra, J.C. who succeeded Shri C. Jagannadhacharyulu as Judicial Commissioner. Pursuant to the certificate granted by the Judicial Commissioner this appeal has been filed. The Submission of Shri Goburdhun, learned Counsel for the appellant, was that the Judicial ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hat neither of the reasons mentioned by the learned Judicial Commissioner constitute a ground for review. It is true as observed by this Court in Shivdev Singh and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors. AIR 1963 SC 1909 there is nothing in Article 226 of the Constitutence preclude a High Court from exercising the power of review which iuheram in every Court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er of errors committed by the Subordinate Court. In the present case both the grounds on which the review was allowed were hardly grounds for review. That two documents which were part of the record were not considered by the Court at the time of issue of a Writ under Article 226, cannot be a ground for review especially when the two documents were not even relied upon by the parties in the affi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
