2013 (12) TMI 506

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... l Excise Act is not sustainable – Decided against Revenue. - E/2785, 2786, 2781, 2782/04-Mum - Final Order Nos. A/397-400/2013-WZB/C-II(EB) - Dated:- 18-4-2013 - Ashok Jindal And P K Jain, JJ. For the Appellant : Shri Ahibaran, AR. For the Respondent : Shri Bharat Raichandani, Adv. PER : Ashok Jindal The Revenue is in appeals against the impugned orders wherein the demand of exci .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... non-excisable goods, demand under Central Excise Act is not sustainable. Being aggrieved by the same, the Revenue is in appeals. 4. Heard both sides. 5. The learned A.R. appearing for the Revenue relied on the decision in the case of L.R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs Meerut - (2008-TIOL-1649-CESTAT-DEL) and CCE Pune I vs. Horizon Flora India Ltd. - (2013-TIOL-203-CESTAT .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X