2013 (12) TMI 700

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ng documents - even though the statements of the proprietor of the Transporter were against the applicants and also the documents relied in the show cause notice were seized from other premises, the applicants were not allowed cross-examination of the person concerned as requested by them repeatedly during the course of adjudication proceeding, on the ground that Applicant should not be allowed to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s, they were charged with removal of Pig Iron of 5000 MT (Approx.) from their factory premises clandestinely. It is his submission that there is no other documentary evidence nor statements accepting such alleged removals by the Appellant, except the entries made in the documents maintained by M/s. Rana Roadways. He has contended that no incriminating documents were seized from their premises, eve .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ment of goods, there is no other evidence nor any acceptance by the applicant nor any of its employees. 3. Heard both sides and perused the records. We find that the entire allegation of removal of 5000 MT (Approx.) pig iron has been alleged and confirmed on the basis of the documents maintained by the transporter viz. M/s. Rana Roadways and also on the basis of statement of proprietor of M/s. R .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X