2013 (12) TMI 733

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rovider - Held that:- On totality of the construction of the agreement without being read in piece-meal does not throw light to hold that the objective of the parties was to provide manpower only without carrying out manufacture. Had that been the objective, the appellant would have ceased to operate after supply of manpower. But that was not so. While object is clear from Clause 3 of agreement, t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Clause 3 thereof following the sequence mentioned therein and supported by the act carried out. By a proper construction of agreement, one can infer that manufacturing activity carried out by the appellant is beyond the scope of Service Tax law to tax such activity. There was no 'manpower supply' when manufacturing was intended object of the agreement. Discharge of the contractual obligation under .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s of the authorities at page 63 of the appeal folder, wherein the authorities had noted that :- "In the instant case all the three persons mentioned in last para of the above letter are not covered under the above referred service as they did the job work themselves. The service receiver has not paid amount individual person who have performed the job work. Moreover, labour employed for the job w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X