2014 (1) TMI 958

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... o, Superintendent (AR) ORDER Per: P.G. Chacko; This application filed by the appellant prays for restoration of their appeal which was dismissed for non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act vide Final Order No. 758/2012 dated 20.12.2012. 2. After hearing both sides, we note that the appellant could not pre-deposit the entire amount which was required to be pre-deposited. They .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... of Rs. 20 lakhs on 05.02.2013 as evidenced by the documents accompanying the present application. This payment has not been disputed before us. Obviously, there is a delay on the part of the appellant in depositing the balance amount of Rs. 20 lakhs. The learned counsel for the appellant has satisfactorily explained the cause of this delay. We have heard the learned Superintendent (AR) also. 3. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X