2014 (2) TMI 1055

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... L. Narasimhan, Advocate, for the Respondent ORDER The dispute in the present appeal of the Revenue is as to whether the radio active material (californlum - 252) used in fast lab analyzer is a eligible capital goods or not. Commissioner (Appeals) has held in favour of the respondent by observing as under :- ''6. I have carefully gone through the case records and submissions made by the app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . I find that merely being consumed in due course of time, does not disqualify any item from being a component or part of certain capital goods. 7. I also find that the appellants had pleaded before the adjudicating authority that the item in question is a component of Fastlab Analyzer, and in fact without this component the said analyzer cannot function at all. The appellants had also submi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X