9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (3) TMI 192X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r the Respondent : Shri K.S.V.V. Prasad, JC (AR) ORDER Per P.K. Das; 1. Common issue is involved in these applications and therefore all are taken up together for disposal. In all these cases, the applicants are individuals entered into agreement separately with M/s. Tractors and Farm Equipments Ltd., Madurai (TAFE), who engaged in the business of manufacture of tractors. By that agreement, app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... men copy of the agreement between M. Arulprakasam and M/s. TAFE. It is contended that they have not supplied the labourers. In other words, they undertook specific contracts for manufacture, assembly operation at the factory premises of M/s. TAFE. It is also submitted that the workers supplied by the applicant would be engaged in the operation of the manufacture of the tractors. He relies upon Boa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... for a consideration. The terms of individual's employment maybe laid down in a formal contract or letter of appointment or on a less formal basis. What is relevant is that the staff are not contractually employed by the recipient but come under his direction." He also submits that in many of the cases, the demands are covered by extended period of limitation and therefore it is not sustainable. H ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... cie, it appears that the applicant is a contractor and supplied the labourers to M/s.TAFE, which would come within the definition of "Man Power Supply". In this factual background, the case laws relied upon by the learned advocate would not be applicable. After considering the submission of the learned advocate that all the applicants are individual persons and the demands except in two cases are ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
