2014 (3) TMI 835

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hat Appearance on its behalf could not be ensured on account of an ongoing investigation into another company - Held that:- whether the petitioner’s reason for not responding to the summons issued in this case on 26.02.2014 was justifiable or valid reasons cannot be considered in the writ proceedings. However, it is open to the petitioner or its Directors to duly bring the reasons to the notice of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e duly assessed to service tax under the provisions of Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner contends that pursuant to the impugned summons, due appearance on its behalf could not be ensured on account of an ongoing investigation into another company, i.e., M/s Vigneshwara Developwell Pvt. Ltd. which has common Directors with the petitioner company. It is submitted that this Court had recently disp .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X