9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (3) TMI 920X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P R Chandrasekharan: The appeal and stay application are directed against the Order-in-Original no. 09/RN/COMMR/M-II/2013-14 dated 24.09.2013 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-II. Vide the impugned order, excise duty demand of Rs.1,68,90,942/- has been confirmed against the appellant for the period April, 2011 to October, 2011 along with interest thereon. Aggrieved of the same ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... duty confirmed be ordered. Alternatively, he submits that the case be transferred to the other Bench of the Tribunal, who had decided the matter earlier. 3.1 The learned Counsel also points out that except for the demand for the period April, 2003 to March, 2008, all the other demands were for the normal period of time. He also relies on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Bhagyanagar Gas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n before this Tribunal on the last occasion on 21.1.2014, this Tribunal after considering the submissions made by both the sides, directed the appellant to make a pre-deposit of 50% of the duty confirmed on the ground that on the earlier decisions, pre-deposit was ordered taking into account the demand for the normal period of time. In the case before us, the entire demand is for the normal period ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
