9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (7) TMI 884X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... P. No. 3632 of 2008, as the controversy in all these cases is identical. For the sake of convenience, only the relevant facts are borrowed from W.P. No. 3630 of 2008. The petitioner-company had claimed exemption from payment of commercial tax. However, the said claim was not accepted by the competent authority. An appeal filed by the petitioner-company before the State Level Committee was also ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... assed by the State Appellate Forum on May 3, 2005 against the petitioner-company was a subject-matter of challenge before this court in W.P. No. 826 of 2005 Parth Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. v. State Appellate Forum [2009] 23 VST 218 (MP). The aforesaid writ petition came up for hearing on July 8, 2008 before this court. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the aforesaid order dated May 3, 200 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... sional authority is set aside to the extent that the exemption claimed by the petitioner-company has been declined. However, the order with regard to other aspects is upheld being not a subject-matter of challenge. The matter is remitted to the revisional authority for a fresh decision on the said question. Since the eligibility matter has been remitted to the State Appellate Forum and a time f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
