9911796707
TMI Blog2008 (7) TMI 884X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ee writ petitions being W.P. No. 3630 of 2008, W.P. No. 3631 of 2008 and W.P. No. 3632 of 2008, as the controversy in all these cases is identical. For the sake of convenience, only the relevant facts are borrowed from W.P. No. 3630 of 2008. The petitioner-company had claimed exemption from payment of commercial tax. However, the said claim was not accepted by the competent authority. An appeal f ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... he revisional order dated March 31, 2008. The order of rejection passed by the State Appellate Forum on May 3, 2005 against the petitioner-company was a subject-matter of challenge before this court in W.P. No. 826 of 2005 Parth Rasayan Pvt. Ltd. v. State Appellate Forum [2009] 23 VST 218 (MP). The aforesaid writ petition came up for hearing on July 8, 2008 before this court. After hearing the le ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the order dated March 31, 2008 (annexure P6) passed by the revisional authority is set aside to the extent that the exemption claimed by the petitioner-company has been declined. However, the order with regard to other aspects is upheld being not a subject-matter of challenge. The matter is remitted to the revisional authority for a fresh decision on the said question. Since the eligibility matte ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
