TMI Blog2009 (7) TMI 1169X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... r,JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Suresh Kumar For the Respondent : Mr. R. Murlicharani/b. M/s. Rajesh Shah Co. ORDER P. C. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 3 and another in the case of CIT Vs. G.N.Agrawal (Individual) 217 ITR 250. In this view of the matter, appeal stands dismissed for want of substantial question of law. No order as to costs. - - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|