9911796707
TMI BlogINTEREST PROVISION IN SERVICE TAXX X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... INTEREST PROVISION IN SERVICE TAX - By: - Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal - Service Tax - Dated:- 18-7-2014 - - Interest on Delayed Payment of Service Tax ( Section 75 ) According to Section 75 , of the Finance Act, 1994 , Every person, liable to pay the tax in accordance with the provisions of Section 68 , or rules made thereunder, who fails to credit the tax or any part thereof to the account of the Central Government within the period prescribed shall pay simple interest at such rate not below ten per cent and not exceeding thirty six per cent per annum, as is for the time being fixed by the Central Government, by notification in the Official Gazette for the period by which such crediting of the tax or any part thereof is delayed . Se ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ction 75 is a charging provision which provides for charging of interest at the prescribed rate for the failure on the part of the assessee to pay to the credit of the Central Government in the prescribed or stipulated period. This interest will be on the amount of Service Tax due. The rate of interest has been as under: W.e.f. 16-10-1998 24 per cent p.a. W.e.f. 16-7-2001 1.5 per cent per month W.e.f. 16-8-2002 15 per cent p.a. W.e.f. 10-9-2004 13 per cent p.a. W.e.f. 1-4-2011 18 per cent p.a. (15 per cent for specified assessees) W. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e.f. 1.10.2014 18 / 24 / 30 percent p.a. It should be noted that section 75 stipulates interest only on delayed payment of service tax. As such, no interest can be levied on the delayed payment of any amount other than service tax under any section of Finance Act, 1994 . Section 75 does not authorize the Department to charge interest on delayed payment of education cess. In JK Synthetics v. CTO 1994 (5) TMI 233 - SUPREME COURT , it was held that any provision made in a statute for charging or levying interest on delayed payment of tax must be considered as substantive law and not an adjectival law and interest was not payable on the additional sales tax from the date on which the returns were filed ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... but interest had to be paid only from the date subsequent to determination of sales tax. In India Carbon Ltd. v. State of Assam 1997 (7) TMI 566 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , it was held that interest can be levied and charged on delayed payment of tax only if the statute that levies and charges the tax makes a substantive provision in this behalf. Interest is also not payable if the delay is cause because of the Government procedure of transferring from one account head to other account head. [BSNL v. CCE (2006) 6 STJ 128 (CESTAT, Bangalore); Chennai Telephones v. CCE, Chennai (2005) 1 STJ 86 (CESTAT, Bangalore)] Revised Rate of Interest w.e.f. 1.10.2014 Vide Notification No 12/2014-ST dated 11.7.2014 , rate of interest to be char ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ged on delayed payment of service tax has been enhanced w.e.f. 1.10.2014, based on period of delay. Thus, longer the delay period, higher would be the rate of interest payable. Accordingly, the rate of interest shall be as under: S.No. Period of delay Rate of Simple Interest Per Annum 1 Up to six months 18 percent 2 More than six months and up to one year 18 percent for the first six months of delay; 24 percent for delay beyond six months 3 More than one year 18 percent for the first six months of delay; 24 percent for period beyond si ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... x months up to one year; 30 percent for any delay beyond one year To illustrate, suppose, there is a delay of 15 months in payment of service tax of ₹ 1 lakh by the assessee. The impact of rate change would be as under: If paid prior to 1.10.2014 Interest @ 18% p.a for 15 months Rs. 22500 If paid after 1.10.2014 (say due on 1 August 2013 and paid on 1 November 2014 ) Period upto 30.9.2014 (14 months @ 18 % p.a.) ₹ 21000 1 month @ 30% p.a.(as delay is 1 year) Rs. 2500 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Total Interest ₹ 23500 The impact of interest would be much more if payment is delayed after October, 2014. It may be noted that : 3 percent interest rate concession allowed u/s 75 shall continue to be allowed to specified small service providers This rate structure will not be applicable to VCES cases as interest @ 18% p.a. is payable under the scheme which ends on 31 December, 2014 The rate of interest is simple interest per annum New interest rate will be operational only on or after 1 October, 2014. Upto 1.10.2014, rate of interest @ 18% p.a. will continue to apply. End Note The proposed new interest rate regime is going to be very tough de-motivati ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng the assessee to indulge into any sort of delay in making the payment, even if they have genuine case on merits to withhold the payment. - Reply By DEV KUMAR KOTHARI as = Charge of interest is to compensate for loss due to delay in payment. It cannot be additional tax, revenue or source of earning.Interest cannot also be in nature of penalty or an arbitrary means to put a check in delays. At best a little higher rate of interest can be levied, so that tax payers do not adopt tendency not to pay tax , withhold the tax and earn by way of interest. For that purpose 3-4% higher rate in comparison to interest on fixed deposits with banks can be justified. At present maximum rate of inerest of fixed deposits in banks is aroud ten p ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ercent. This can be a guiding rate. For government, there is no justification of charging higher interest, particularly due to complexity of law and lot of forced litigation by revenue by raising high pitched assessments of tax or duty.Interest on tax dues should not be a means of finance-trade by government. There should not be high spread between interest paid to tax payer and interest charged on tax payer. There is no justification of such high spread in rate of interest. Interest is compensatory charge and should not be made a penal charge, particularly when there are many penalty provisions. It seems beginning to statutorily prescribe pre-deposit, and higher interest. The same may spread to other tax laws also, unless such provisi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ons are contested on several possible ground of arbitrariness, discriminatory, highhandedness of law makers, and being un-constitutional on various grounds. Dated: 26-7-2014 Reply By Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal as = Necessary changes have been made in section 35FF of excise act to provide for interest in case the deposit is refundable based on appellate order Dated: 3-8-2014 - Scholarly articles for knowledge sharing authors experts professionals Tax Management India - taxmanagementindia - taxmanagement - taxmanagementindia.com - TMI - TaxTMI - TMITax ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
