9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (9) TMI 812X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... :- The petitioner has come up with the present Writ Petition seeking to quash the impugned order of the respondent in TIN No.33571082007/12-13, dated 22.04.2014 and further direct the respondent not to reckon the sum of Rs. 4,96,67,525/- for the year 2012-13 [(being total reported before the inspecting officers for 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2009-10, 2010-11 and 2011-12 (upto November 2012)] and ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al difficulty has not filed objections. Therefore, the respondent confirmed the proposal by order dated 22.04.2014. Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that the respondent has taken into consideration the entire five year sales as one year sales. He would further add that the respondent has pas ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... tition itself is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission. 6. Taking into consideration that the respondent has passed the impugned order in piece-meal for particular months and not for the entire year, I am of the view that this is a fit case, where the impugned order can be set aside and the matter can be remitted back to the respondent to decide the matter afresh. 7. In the resul ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
