TMI Blog2014 (10) TMI 116X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... dgments of the Kerala High Court [2008 (12) TMI 146 - KERALA HIGH COURT], it cannot but be said that it is a plausible view - writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent to accord an opportunity to similarly circumstanced persons to take the oral examination if, his/her case falls within the time frame fixed by the aforementioned judgments of the High Court of Kerala - There is ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... submitted that under Regulation 8 of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 (in short the Regulations) the person desirous of taking the examination has to sit for the written examination and also take an oral exam. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had cleared the written examination on 29-4-2011 and therefore, in terms of Regulation 8(3) he was entitled to ta ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... counsel for the petitioner says that, this judgment has been affirmed by the Division Bench of that court. The Order of the Division Bench is appended at pages 23-24 of the paper book. Mr. Kamal Nijhawan, who appears for the respondent, on advance notice says that he will take appropriate instructions as to whether the Division Bench s judgment was appealed against and if so, the result of the ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed to another kind of dispensation. If Courts in the country were to take a different view in a matter, such as this, it would create a strange anomaly insofar as petitioners in different States are concerned. 4. In matters like this, it would be best for the respondents, if they are aggrieved with the judgment delivered by a Court, to carry the matter to the next appellate forum in order to se ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|