2011 (9) TMI 890

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ted on the following substantial question of law : Whether the Tribunal is right in not considering the fact that MODVAT Scheme presently known as CENVAT credit deals only with the goods covered by the Central Excise Law and that Electricity is not a goods covered by the Central Excise Law? 2. The question raised is as to the applicability of provisions of Rule 57Q or 57R(2) of the Central .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not eligible for Modvat credit as per Rule 57Q and the provisions of Rule 57R(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Hence show cause notice was issued to the assessee to disallow the wrong availment of credit of ₹ 582,400/- and recover the same under Rule 57U read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Appellate Commissioner of Central Excise, Cuddalore after due process o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... mpugned in this appeal. The finding of the CESTAT in dismissing the appeal preferred by the Revenue is as follows : After examining the records and hearing both sides, I find that the decision of Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) is well founded on binding case law. Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) has elaborately dealt with each and every issue and has rendered decision in keeping with case law. None of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X