2014 (12) TMI 956

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... for the Appellant. Shri Govind Dixit, D.R. and B.B. Sharma, D.R., for the Respondent. ORDER In Stay Application No. 2044/2010, stay of further proceedings pursuant to the adjudication order dated 31-3-2010 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Panchkula was sought. The adjudication order confirmed Service Tax demand of Rs. 1,60,34,077/- besides levy of interest and penalties as specifie .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 40 lakhs (directed to be deposited) within time and another Rs. 16 lakhs on 17-5-2013 (after the order dated 12-4-2013) and that the counsel for Revenue had entered no contest on such compliance though belated by the assessee of the condition of the order. 2. Since Revenue is initiating steps for recovery of the entire adjudicated liability under the assumption that with the dismissal of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the balance adjudicated liability on condition of the deposit of Rs. 40 lakhs (the amount having already been deposited as noticed by the judgment of Punjab & Haryana High Court) has revived and shall be operative during pendency of the appeal. In this view of the matter this application is infructous and is dismissed. Consequently Misc. Application 58513/2013 for a similar relief as herein stand .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X