2015 (1) TMI 667

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... irected to be decided by Tribunal on merits but even this order was not complied with by depositing the amount of ₹ 5 lacs within one month. It is also evident from the record that application of modification was rejected and another application for recall of that order was dismissed. In these facts and circumstances, I do not find any error apparent on the face of record on the part of Trib .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed 8.12.2005 permitted the petitioners to deposit ₹ 5 lacs within one month and subject thereto his appeal was directed to be decided by Tribunal on merits but even this order was not complied with by depositing the amount of ₹ 5 lacs within one month. It is also evident from the record that application of modification was rejected by order dated 21.4.2006 and another application for r .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X