Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (2) TMI 359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... In Appeal No. 2255 of 2011, the assessment year in question is 2005-06. An order was made under section 143(3) on April 27, 2007, by the Assessing Officer. The loss of Rs. 480,914,236 was assessed. The assessee is engaged in running of hotels, resorts and clubs. It offers holiday schemes for card members who are entitled to utilise the room nights at the assessee's hotels/resorts to the extent of the amounts paid as per the terms and conditions of the scheme. They are also entitled to surrender the unutilised room nights and receive back not only the deposits proportionate to the unutilised room nights but also a premium thereon, on the expiry of the scheme period. The assessee adopted the practice of showing the advance amount of sale .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ncies and circumstances, does not mean that it is not a receipt. It is a revenue receipt. Considering that the principal business of the assessee is to provide accommodation and other facilities to tourist members, then a provision of the nature made cannot be said to be an allowable revenue expenditure. In such circumstances, this appeal raises substantial questions of law and deserves to be admitted. 5. On the other hand, Mr. J. D. Mistry, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee, submitted that on the questions which are termed as substantial questions of law, this appeal cannot be entertained at all. The facts are not disputed by the Revenue. The facts as noted and undisputed disclose that the matter has been approach .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ribunal decided the appeal of the assessee. That appeal raised several grounds. 7. We are concerned with the issue of advance sale of room nights and the provision of holiday scheme surrender value. 8. In that regard, the Tribunal noted the facts in paragraph 3 to 6. Pertinently, it noted the nature of the activities and the business of the assessee. The Tribunal noted the holiday scheme to card members which is at a discounted/special price on account of advance room nights marketed through its agents. The agents are entitled to pay commission on the offer price collected by them. The assessee had deducted tax on commission payment and paid it on September 2, 2005. The company charged membership entrance fee which is non-refundable. That .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nce and under promise to make available to the customers the rooms. The customer is entitled to surrender the room nights in case they are not utilised and opt for surrender value. When a customer opts for surrender value, he shall be paid in cash by the assessee, or in the alternative the customer may opt to buy or utilise the products and services of the company or group companies. The Tribunal referred to the chart and in relation to each assessment year. That gave a break-up of the advance amount collected. That chart indicated that a very negligible percentage of the customer utilised the room nights. More than 99 per cent. of the customers surrendered the room nights which is not only the amount paid but which is inclusive of a premiu .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to be contrary to the settled accounting standards. If the assessee was required to refund the advance and which has been demonstrably refunded in more than 99 per cent. of the cases, then the receipt has been treated not as a capital receipt. In the lengthy judgment delivered by the Tribunal on both questions, and particularly its reasoning from paragraphs 74 to 87, are essentially based on the facts and the nature and terms and conditions of the scheme. The finding of fact that the schemes oblige the assessee to refund not only the advance but also the surrendered value, then the further conclusion that the assessee incurs a liability and no income accrues to the assessee on receipt of this advance, cannot be said to be perverse or vitia .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates