9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (3) TMI 546X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... in that regard as would be taken in respect of the other assets of the company.- Decided against the applicant. - CO. APPLICATION NO. 2314 OF 2013, CO. PETITION NO. 112 OF 1994 - - - Dated:- 31-7-2014 - A.S. BOPANNA, J. For The Appellant : Gururaj B., For The Respondent : K.S. Mahadevan, V. Jayaram and Thomas V. Peter, ORDER 1. The applicant is before this Court seeking that the Official Liquidator be directed to execute the sale deed in respect of Quarters No.99/B in favour of the applicant in line with the order dated 16.07.2004 passed by this Court in C.A.No. 12/2002 and also based on the order dated 11.09.2009 passed in C.A.No. 1225/2007. 2. The applicant contends that he is a former employee of the company in l ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... onsider the documents that would be filed by the applicants therein seeking allotment of the quarters and thereafter, the Official Liquidator shall consider their request in accordance with law. In such circumstance, the second respondent contends that she was a casual employee in the company in liquidation and therefore, she is entitled to the allotment of the said quarters in her favour. 4. At the outset, it is necessary to notice that the fact which is not in dispute is that the husband of the second respondent, namely Sri CD Rangappa was admittedly an employee of the company in liquidation. He had claimed to be in possession of quarters bearing No. 102/A and had sought for similar relief for allotment of the quarters. The fact that i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e, the issue for consideration is as to whether the relief as sought in the application seeking that the Official Liquidator be directed to allot the quarters in favour of the applicant can be accepted by this Court. In that regard, the fact that the applicant was an employee of the company in liquidation and that he had attained the age of superannuation on 31.12.1996 is evident. However, what is not clear at this stage is as to whether immediately after the superannuation of the applicant, he had vacated the quarters voluntarily or as to whether the company had taken steps to evict the applicant from the quarters. In any event, after the winding up order was passed on 20.10.2000 and the Official Liquidator was put in charge of the company ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
