Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2015 (3) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2015 (3) TMI 546 - HC - Indian Laws


Issues:
1. Claim for execution of sale deed for Quarters No.99/B based on court orders.
2. Rival claim by a second respondent for the same quarters.
3. Dispute over entitlement to allotment of Quarters No.99/B.

Analysis:
1. The applicant, a former employee, sought execution of a sale deed for Quarters No.99/B based on court orders from 2004 and 2009. The court had previously ruled that former employees in possession of quarters are entitled to allotment and sale deed execution. The applicant claimed entitlement to the quarters due to these orders.

2. A second respondent, a casual employee, also claimed entitlement to Quarters No.99/B. The second respondent's husband had been allotted a different quarter, No. 102/A. The court found no evidence supporting the second respondent's individual right to Quarters No.99/B, especially since her husband had already been allotted a quarter.

3. The court noted a lack of clarity regarding the applicant's possession of Quarters No.99/B post-superannuation. The Official Liquidator had taken physical possession of the quarters in 2001, indicating it was vacant. The second respondent claimed occupancy, but it was deemed unauthorized. The court ruled that the Official Liquidator should take possession of the quarters as company property, dismissing the applicant's claim for allotment and sale deed execution.

In conclusion, the court dismissed the application, directing the Official Liquidator to treat Quarters No.99/B as company property and take appropriate steps in line with other company assets.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates