1987 (12) TMI 325

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... re was no substantial question of low. The only plea on behalf of the appellants was that they were claiming sub-tenancy from Shri Bhure in respect of the different portions of the premises in question. The question whether Civil Court had jurisdiction or not in the facts of this case was a substantial question of law. Therefore, it was submitted that the High Court committed an error of law in no .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ew of the matter, we find no ground to interfere with the orders of the High Court. Our attention was drawn on certain decisions of this Court viz. Babulal Bhuramal and Anr. v. Nandram Shivram and Ors. 1959 SCR 367; Om Prakash Gupta v. Rattan Singh and Anr. and Dipak Banerjee v. Smt. Lilabati Chakraborty . 2. These cases dealt with entirely different contexts and observations made therein are n .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... llants will pay to the respondent arrears of rent, if any, within one month from today. 4. That the Appellants will not induct any other person in the suit premises. It is further directed that in default of compliance with any one or more of these conditions or if the undertaking is not filed as required within the stipulated time, the decree shall become executable forthwith. - - TaxTM .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X