TMI Blog2015 (4) TMI 274X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... overy in the case of Anuradha Industries Vs Commissioner of Central Excise Hyderabad (2015 (4) TMI 275 - CESTAT BANGALORE). He further points out that, in the stay order passed by this Bench on 30.4.2013 in the case of Anuradha Industries, the view taken by the coordinate Bench at Mumbai in the case of Kaysons Plasto Print Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Kolhapur (2015 (4) TMI 276 - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... arising out of denial of SSI benefit for the period from October 2005 to March 2010 in respect of specified goods which were found to have been cleared under brand name shalimar belonging to M/s Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that, on a similar set of facts, this Bench granted waiver of predeposit and stay of recovery in the case of Anuradha Industries ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|