Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (4) TMI 701

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in favour of Revenue. - Tax Appeal No.104 of 2015, Civil Application (OJ) No.139 of 2015, Tax Appeal No.104 of 2015 - - - Dated:- 19-3-2015 - M. R. Shah And S. H. Vora,JJ. For the Appellant : Mr Chintan Dave, AGP For the Respondents : Mr Tushar P Hemani, Adv. and Ms Vaibhavi K Parikh, Adv. ORDER (Per : Honourable Mr. Justice M. R. Shah) 1. The present Tax Appeal is ADMITTED to consider the following substantial questions of law; (A) Whether the Tribunal erred in adjudicating on merits despite first appellate authority adjudicated only on the issue of pre-deposit? (B) Whether the Tribunal erred in not directing that for computing interest liability for subsequent year the assessee will not get benefit of carr .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... on non deposit of the amount of pre-deposit only, and, therefore, as such, the learned tribunal ought to have concentrated only on the order passed by the first appellate authority dismissing the appeal not on merits but on non deposit of the amount of pre-deposit. The learned tribunal as such was required to consider the legality and validity of the order passed by the first appellate authority with respect to the amount of pre-deposit and / or dismissing the appeal on non payment of pre-deposit as directed earlier. From the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned tribunal, it appears that the learned tribunal has without even deciding the main issue in the appeal i.e. without considering the legality and validity of the order pa .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rmination of the entire appeal by the Tribunal at the such juncture, in our opinion, is not a desirable approach. We may not choose to interfere in all such cases where the Tribunal has straightway chosen to decide the matter on merit instead of determining issue of pre deposit which was at large before it. However, so as to ensure that a dent is made in such practice followed consistently that we have chosen to remand this matter. Once, when assessee chooses not to comply with the requirement of making pre deposit or contest the matter on the ground of pre-deposit and either side approaches the second appellate authority, there does not arise any question of circumventing the very stage and exercise the powers of first appellate authority. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... by another decision of the Apex Court rendered in case of Commissioner of C.Ex., Chandigarh v. Smithkline Beecham Co. Health C. Limited., reported in 2003 [157] ELT 497 (SC), wherein it is observed, thus 2. This appeal is filed against an order passed by the Customs, Excise Gold [Control] Appellate Tribunal dated 19th December 2002. The Tribunal was hearing an appeal against an order dated 23rd April 2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise [Appeals]. By that order, the Commissioner [Appeals] had merely dismissed the appeal because pre deposit was not made. The Commissioner [Appeals] had not gone into the merits. Therefore, the only question before the Tribunal was whether pre deposit was required or not. The Tribunal has chosen .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r dismissing the appeal on non deposit of the amount of pre-deposit. It appears that despite the above, message has not reached the learned tribunal and the learned tribunal has continued to pass similar and such orders ignoring the decision of the High Court. The learned tribunal is bound to obey the decision of the High Court. It is not open for the learned tribunal to ignore the directions, observations or orders passed by the High Court. If instead of the learned tribunal any other person would have ignored the order passed by the High Court it would tantamount to Contempt of Court. However, we refrain ourselves from making any observations and we rest the matter there with a hope that in future the learned tribunal will absolutely foll .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates