9911796707
TMI Blog2015 (5) TMI 613X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... liability to be attached to the legal representatives of a deceased person, is also inapplicable. The language of Section 159 ex-facie applies to natural persons, and cannot be extended, through a legal fiction, to the dissolution of companies. In the present case, no doubt there was participation during the course of assessment; however, the AO, despite being told that the original company was no longer in existence, did not take remedial measures and did not transpose the transferee as the company which had to be assessed. Instead, he resorted to a peculiar procedure of describing the original assessee as the one in existence; the order also mentioned the transferee's name below that of M/s Micra India Pvt. Ltd. Now, that did not lead ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d assessee (M/s Micra India Pvt. Ltd.) with M/s Dynamic Buildmart (P) Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as transferee ). The order sanctioning the amalgamation scheme was made by this Court on 22.12.2009; in its terms the appointed date was 01.04.2008. In other words, the amalgamation was w.e.f. 01.04.2008. In terms of the sanctioned scheme, the liabilities of the transferor company, i.e. the original assessee M/s Micra India Pvt. Ltd., were to be taken over and discharged by the transferee. For the subsequent period, i.e. 2009-10 and 2010-11, comprehensive returns were filed by transferee-company at the relevant time. Accordingly, the fact of amalgamation was communicated to the revenue on 06.05.2010. While so, on 08.09.2010, the revenue issu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... after receiving the notice under Section 153C, the assessee participated in the proceedings. The AO, in fact took note of the change resultant from the amalgamation and reflected that in the assessment order. The revenue further argues that having participated in the assessment proceedings, it is not open to the assessee to contest their validity; it relies upon Section 292B of the Act in support of this contention. 4. Learned counsel for the assessee argued that the proceedings against M/s Micra India Pvt. Ltd. abated with its dissolution, consequent upon its amalgamation with the transferee company. This event was notified well in advance by the transferee company, which had even reflected the income and other related matters of the t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... (CA) that once a company is dissolved it becomes a non-existent party and therefore no action can be brought in its name. Thus an insurance company which was subrogated to the rights of another insured company was held not to be entitled to maintain an action in the name of the company after the latter had been dissolved XXX XXX XXX 15. Likewise, in the case of Sri Nath Suresh Chand Ram Naresh Vs. CIT (2006) 280 ITR 396, the Allahabad High Court held that the issue of notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act is a condition precedent to the validity of any assessment order to be passed under section 147 of the Act and when such a notice is not issued and assessment made, such a defect cannot be treated as cured under Section 29 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nsferor company ceased to have any entity and the amalgamated company acquired a new status and it was not possible to treat the two companies as partners or jointly liable in respect of their liabilities and assets. In Vivid Marketing (supra), this court held: When the Assessing Officer passed the order of assessment against the respondent company, it had already been dissolved and struck off the register of the Registrar of companies u/s 560 of the Companies Act. In these circumstances, the Tribunal rightly held that there could not have been any assessment order passed against the company which was not in existence as on that date in the eyes of law it had already been dissolved. It was further held that Section 176 of the Ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... titute the successor in place of the amalgamated company. Thus, such a defect cannot be treated as procedural defect . In any event, it is to be noted that the fact of amalgamation of the assessee with the transferee company had been intimated and disclosed in response to the notice under Section 153C on 22.11.2010. Accordingly, this ground, too, has no merit and is rejected. 10. In the present case, no doubt there was participation during the course of assessment; however, the AO, despite being told that the original company was no longer in existence, did not take remedial measures and did not transpose the transferee as the company which had to be assessed. Instead, he resorted to a peculiar procedure of describing the original asses ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
