2014 (1) TMI 1654

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rcumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that Cenvat credit distributed by Merck is not in accordance with Rule 2(m) read with Rule 7 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004? (c) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in not holding that all the services in respect of which credit has been distributed by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct and justified in holding that the appellants have suppressed information with mala fide intention of evading duty and sustaining the demand for extended period under Rule 14 of CCR read with Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944? 2. As regards the prayer for interim stay, learned counsel for the Revenue prays for time to file affidavit-in-reply .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X