2014 (8) TMI 990

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ub-section (1) of Section 35G. Adverting to the impugned order of CESTAT, we see that the Tribunal has pointedly decided all disputed issues of facts on the contentious point as to whether manufacture of goods was carried out in the brand name of another establishment. The answers given by the Tribunal are purely answers to questions of facts, based on the evidence on record. - Decided against Rev .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... s to whether manufacture of goods was carried out in the brand name of another establishment. The answers given by the Tribunal are purely answers to questions of facts, based on the evidence on record. We, therefore, see no ground to interfere in this appeal, since it does not carry any substantial question of law to be answered by the High Court. In the result, this appeal fails and it is dis .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X